Micromobility Vehicle OBE --> Multi-Access Edge Computing:
personal location
This flow may also be implemented by
Micromobility Vehicle OBE --> Connected Vehicle Roadside Equipment: personal location Definitions
personal location (Information Flow): The current location (latitude, longitude, and elevation) reported by the personal information or safety device
Micromobility Vehicle OBE (Source Physical Object): The Micromobility Vehicle On-Board Equipment (MMV OBE) provides the vehicle-based sensory, processing, storage, and communications functions that support efficient, safe, and convenient travel. The MMV OBE includes general capabilities that apply to bicycles and other low-powered mobility devices such as e-scooters, powered wheelchairs, and power assisted bicycles. The MMV OBE includes the common interfaces and functions that could apply to any low-powered mobility device. The radio(s) supporting V2V and V2I communications are a key component of the MMV OBE. Both one-way and two-way communications options support a spectrum of information services from basic broadcast to advanced personalized information services. Advanced sensors, processors, and enhanced traveler interfaces (through PIDs), complement traveler information services so that, in addition to making informed mode and route selections, the vulnerable road user travels these routes in a safer and more consistent manner.
Multi-Access Edge Computing (Destination Physical Object): 'Multi-Access Edge Computing' ((MEC) previously known as mobile edge computing) represents computing devices that operate and are managed like a cloud server, but are deployed at the edge of a network (typically a cellular network, but it could be any network). While not in strict proximity to the transportation network, these systems do benefit from vastly decreased distances to the roadway compared to central systems, and so can provide lower latency than strictly backoffice systems
Included In
This Triple is in the following Service Packages:
This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:
This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:
- None
This Triple has the following triple relationships:
| None |
Communication Solutions
-
(None-Data) - Secure Wireless Internet (EU) (43)
-
(None-Data) - Secure Wireless Internet (ITS) (43)
Selected Solution
(None-Data) - Secure Wireless Internet (ITS)Solution Description
|
ITS Application Entity
![]() ![]()
Development needed ![]() |
Click gap icons for more info.
|
||
|
Mgmt
|
Facilities
Development needed ![]() |
Security
![]()
|
|
|
TransNet
|
|||
|
Access
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|||
Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.
Characteristics
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Time Context | Recent |
| Spatial Context | Regional |
| Acknowledgement | False |
| Cardinality | Unicast |
| Initiator | Source |
| Authenticable | True |
| Encrypt | False |
| Interoperability | Description |
|---|---|
| National | This triple should be implemented consistently within the geopolitical region through which movement is essentially free (e.g., the United States, the European Union). |
Security
| Information Flow Security | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | ||
| Rating | Not Applicable | High | Moderate | |
| Basis | This data is intentionally transmitted to everyone via a broadcast. It can also be determined via other visual indicators. | An incorrect location message could lead to a false warning or lack of warning. A lack of warning can have obvious catastrophic consequences, while a false warning could lead to users ignoring warnings due to perceived inaccuracy. Given that this triple may apply to highly dynamic environments (such as work zones), its accuracy is paramount, and thus if sent, must have HIGH integrity. | There are other visual indicators about the geofenced areas. PID users in dynamic environments (incident and work zones) should know when they are leaving a geofenced area. As long as they remain in the geofenced area, this information is not as necessary. Not all pedestrians will carry a personal information device, and the system should be able to operate without this information. | |
| Security Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Authenticable | True |
| Encrypt | False |




