Traffic Management Center --> Archived Data System:
performance metrics

Definition
Included In
Communication Solutions
Characteristics
Security

Definitions

performance metrics (Information Flow): Data that indicates how well the transportation system is performing. Performance metrics are tracked over time to monitor progress towards operations objectives and identify needs and deficiencies to be addressed.

Traffic Management Center (Source Physical Object): The 'Traffic Management Center' monitors and controls traffic and the road network. It represents centers that manage a broad range of transportation facilities including freeway systems, rural and suburban highway systems, and urban and suburban traffic control systems. It communicates with ITS Roadway Equipment and Connected Vehicle Roadside Equipment (RSE) to monitor and manage traffic flow and monitor the condition of the roadway, surrounding environmental conditions, and field equipment status. It manages traffic and transportation resources to support allied agencies in responding to, and recovering from, incidents ranging from minor traffic incidents through major disasters.

Archived Data System (Destination Physical Object): The 'Archived Data System' collects, archives, manages, and distributes data generated from ITS sources for use in transportation administration, policy evaluation, safety, planning, performance monitoring, program assessment, operations, and research applications. The data received is formatted and tagged with attributes that define the data source, conditions under which it was collected, data transformations, and other information (i.e. meta data) necessary to interpret the data. The archive can fuse ITS generated data with data from non-ITS sources and other archives to generate information products utilizing data from multiple functional areas, modes, and jurisdictions. The archive prepares data products that can serve as inputs to federal, state, and local data reporting systems. The 'Archived Data System' may reside within an operational center and provide focused access to a particular agency's data archives. Alternatively, it may operate as a distinct center that collects data from multiple agencies and sources and provides a general data warehouse service.

Included In

This Triple is in the following Service Packages:

DM02: Performance Monitoring

This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:

This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:

traffic_performance_metrics

This Triple has the following triple relationships:

None

Communication Solutions

Solutions are sorted in ascending Gap Severity order. The Gap Severity is the parenthetical number at the end of the solution.

Selected Solution

Data for Distribution (TBD) - OMG DDS

Solution Description

This solution is used within Canada and the U.S.. It combines standards associated with Data for Distribution (TBD) with those for OMG DDS. The Data for Distribution (TBD) standards include a placeholder for upper-layer standards necessary to define the data (elements and structures) necessary to complete a solution for the information flow based on data distribution technologies. The data standard will need to include a specific customization for the desired data distribution technology used (e.g., Kafka, DDS, etc.).. The OMG DDS standards include lower-layer standards that support secure data sharing and command operations between remote devices.

ITS Application Entity Development needed			Click gap icons for more info.
Mgmt OMG DDS	Facilities OMG DDS OMG DDS-RPC OMG DDSI-RTPS	Security OMG DDS-Security
	TransNet IETF RFC 768 IP Alternatives
	Access Internet Subnet Alternatives

Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.

Characteristics

Characteristic	Value
Time Context	Historical
Spatial Context	Regional
Acknowledgement	True
Cardinality	Unicast
Initiator	Source
Authenticable	True
Encrypt	False

Interoperability	Description
Regional	Interoperability throughout the geopolitical region is highly desirable, but if implemented differently in different transportation management jurisdictions, significant benefits will still accrue in each jurisdiction. Regardless, this Information Flow Triple should be implemented consistently within a transportation jurisdiction (i.e., the scope of a regional architecture).

Security

Information Flow Security
	Confidentiality	Integrity	Availability
Rating	Low	Moderate	Low
Basis	Contains information characterizing the performance of some aspect(s) of the transportation system; not typically competetive, will include no PII. Might in some circumstances be slightly sensitive, but there's no clear case where observation of this information by a third party would cause significant impact.	Decisions may be made regarding this information; if the information were incorrect, suboptimal decisions may be made.	Much depends on how integrated the performance information is to traffic management decision-making. If integral, this could be MODERATE. Generally though, the transportation system should be able to function reasonably with occasional outages.

Security Characteristics	Value
Authenticable	True
Encrypt	False

Traffic Management Center --> Archived Data System:performance metrics