Traffic Management Center --> Center:
traffic images
Definitions
traffic images (Information Flow): High fidelity, real-time traffic images suitable for surveillance monitoring by the operator or for use in machine vision applications. This flow includes the images. Meta data that describes the images is contained in another flow.
Traffic Management Center (Source Physical Object): The 'Traffic Management Center' monitors and controls traffic and the road network. It represents centers that manage a broad range of transportation facilities including freeway systems, rural and suburban highway systems, and urban and suburban traffic control systems. It communicates with ITS Roadway Equipment and Connected Vehicle Roadside Equipment (RSE) to monitor and manage traffic flow and monitor the condition of the roadway, surrounding environmental conditions, and field equipment status. It manages traffic and transportation resources to support allied agencies in responding to, and recovering from, incidents ranging from minor traffic incidents through major disasters.
Center (Destination Physical Object): This general physical object is used to model core capabilities that are common to any center.
Included In
This Triple is in the following Service Packages:
- None
This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:
- None
This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:
- None
This Triple has the following triple relationships:
| None |
Communication Solutions
-
(None-Data) - Secure Internet (ITS) (43)
-
(None-Data) - OMG DDS (44)
-
(None-Data) - Apache Kafka (44)
-
(None-Data) - Eclipse Zenoh (45)
-
(None-Data) - OASIS MQTT (50)
-
(None-Data) - OASIS AMQP (61)
Selected Solution
Solution Description
|
ITS Application Entity
![]() ![]()
Development needed ![]() |
Click gap icons for more info.
|
||
|
Mgmt
|
Facilities
Development needed ![]() |
Security
![]()
|
|
|
TransNet
|
|||
|
Access
Internet Subnet Alternatives ![]() |
|||
Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.
Characteristics
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Time Context | Now |
| Spatial Context | Regional |
| Acknowledgement | True |
| Cardinality | Unicast |
| Initiator | Destination |
| Authenticable | True |
| Encrypt | False |
| Interoperability | Description |
|---|---|
| Regional | Interoperability throughout the geopolitical region is highly desirable, but if implemented differently in different transportation management jurisdictions, significant benefits will still accrue in each jurisdiction. Regardless, this Information Flow Triple should be implemented consistently within a transportation jurisdiction (i.e., the scope of a regional architecture). |
Security
| Information Flow Security | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | ||
| Rating | Low | Moderate | Moderate | |
| Basis | Traffic image data is generally intended for public consumption, and in any event is already video captured in the public arena, so this must be LOW. | While accuracy of this data is important for decision making purposes, applications should be able to cfunction without it. Thus MODERATE generally. | While availability of imagery is useful for decision making purposes, applications should be able to cfunction without it. Thus MODERATE generally, though it could be LOW. | |
| Security Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Authenticable | True |
| Encrypt | False |


