Parking - Secure Internet (ITS)
Description:
This solution is used within Australia, Canada, the E.U. and the U.S.. It combines standards associated with Parking with those for I-I: Secure Internet (ITS). The Parking standards include upper-layer standards required to exchange parking information. The I-I: Secure Internet (ITS) standards include lower-layer standards that support secure communications between ITS equipment using X.509 or IEEE 1609.2 security certificates.Relevant Regions:
- Australia
- Canada
- European Union
- United States
Comm Profile: I-I: Secure Internet (ITS)
Comm Class: WAN - Wide Area Network
Standards in Profile:
| Level | Standard |
|---|---|
| Access | Internet Subnet Alternatives |
| Mgmt | Bundle: SNMPv3 MIB |
| Security | Secure Session Alternatives |
| TransNet | Internet Transport Alternatives |
| TransNet | IP Alternatives |
Data Profile: Parking
Standards in Profile:
| Level | Standard |
|---|---|
| ITS Application Entity | ISO 5206-1 - Parking data model |
Solution Issues Severity: 19
The severity issue score calculation only includes issues associated with standards that are included by default.
Solution Issues:
| Default | Severity | Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| False | Medium | Option not standardized | Standardization Gap | The option set includes at least one option that is not (yet) defined in a standard. |
| False | Medium | Uncertainty about trust revocation mechanism | Security Gap | The mechanisms used to prevent bad actors from sending authorized messages is unproven. |
| True | Medium | Outdated security reference | Security Gap | The standard solution includes an outdated security reference. |
| True | High | Draft not available (Critical) | Standardization Gap | The standards development organization has established a work item for the subject standard but a draft is not available for this critical feature to enable the interface. The draft may be missing due to the work item being new or simply a lack of activity on the work item. |
| True | High | Use case not considered in design (critical) | ITS Info Gap | While the indicated standards nominally address the information flow, the design details may not meet performance or other requirements because this particular use case was not the focus of the design effort. |