EU: In-Vehicle Information - BTP/GeoNetworking/G5
Description:
This solution is used within Australia and the E.U.. It combines standards associated with EU: In-Vehicle Information with those for V-X: BTP/GeoNetworking/G5. The EU: In-Vehicle Information standards include upper-layer standards required to provide a visualisation of static and/or dynamic traffic sign information inside a vehicle. The V-X: BTP/GeoNetworking/G5 standards include lower-layer standards that support broadcast, near constant, low latency vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications using the ETSI GeoNetworking Bundle over the 5.9GHz spectrum.Relevant Regions:
- Australia
- European Union
Comm Profile: V-X: BTP/GeoNetworking/G5
Comm Class: LAN - Local Area Network
Standards in Profile:
| Level | Standard |
|---|---|
| Access | Bundle: ETSI ITS-G5 |
| Mgmt | ETSI 302 890-1 Service Announcement |
| Security | Bundle: ETSI ITS-S Security Architecture |
| TransNet | Bundle: GeoNetworking BTP |
Data Profile: EU: In-Vehicle Information
Standards in Profile:
| Level | Standard |
|---|---|
| Facilities | ISO 14823 TTI Graphic DD |
| ITS Application Entity | ISO 17425 In-Vehicle presentation of road and traffic data |
| ITS Application Entity | ISO 19321 IVI Data Dictionary |
Solution Issues Severity: 24
The severity issue score calculation only includes issues associated with standards that are included by default.
Solution Issues:
| Default | Severity | Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| True | Low | Protocol features partly not applicable in the given context | Performance / Applicability Gap | A feature of the protocol is not fully applicable in the given context, e.g. GeoNetworking multi-hop forwarding in 5.9 GHz channels. |
| True | Medium | Overlap of standards | Overlap | Multiple standards have been developed to address this information and it is unclear which standard should be used to address this specific information flow. |
| True | Medium | Security inadequate | Security Gap | The solution does not provide adequate communications security for the information triple, which potentially jeopardizes C-ITS operations. |
| True | Medium | Still under development | Standardization Gap | A draft of the standard has been developed by the working group, but it was still under development at the time this analysis was performed. |
| True | Medium | Uncertainty about trust revocation mechanism | Security Gap | The mechanisms used to prevent bad actors from sending authorized messages is unproven. |
| True | Medium | Use case not considered in design (medium) | ITS Info Gap | While the indicated standards nominally address the information flow, the design may not meet practical constraints because this particular use case was not the focus of the design effort. |
| True | High | Draft not available (Critical) | Standardization Gap | The standards development organization has established a work item for the subject standard but a draft is not available for this critical feature to enable the interface. The draft may be missing due to the work item being new or simply a lack of activity on the work item. |